Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cancer. Show all posts

your abs are made in the kitchen...



What’s My Theme song of the day? Well, today in Zumba tonight, I will be using a Michael Jackson song for the warmup and cool down in honor of his life, should be fun! I will also be doing a routine to the song “Dance and Shout” Shaggy’s version. It should be lots of fun! What’s your theme song of the day? 



Trained cancer killer


Medicine harnesses the might of the immune system defeat prostate cancer
Doctors have been trying to enlist the immune system of patients in the battle against cancer since at least 1893, when physician William Coley of New York Cancer Hospital injected bacteria into a patient’s body in the hopes that it would spur the immune system to fight the bacterial infection and cancer cells alike. The tumor disappeared, and the patient lived for another 26 years. But immunotherapy was eclipsed by radiation and chemotherapy, which showed more-immediate and reproducible results.
Last April, Provenge became the first FDA-approved treatment that retrains the immune system to target cancer. Scientists have tested it only on subjects already near death, in this case men whose tumors had spread beyond their prostate. Those who took Provenge lived an average of 4.1 months longer than those who didn’t. Now researchers at Dendreon, which manufactures Provenge, are looking into whether it can stop the cancer from spreading beyond the prostate. If that can be done, says Paul Schellhammer, a urologist at Eastern Virginia Medical School who studied Provenge in clinical trials, the patient will usually survive.

By Carina Storrs via PopSci Google Chrome App



Joining a Gym

before you start any strenuous exercise make sure with your doctor that this is OK for you. You don’t want to hurt yourself or make yourself sick. For some people a brisk walk every day is enough.

If you have a certain exercise you love then by all means indulge this. If you love to dance, find a gym that offers dance classes! If you love to swim, make sure you join a gym with a pool. Exercise if by no means all about lifting weights. If you are looking for a gym with a pool be prepared to pay a bit more for a membership than a gym with out.

You also want to make sure you feel safe at this gym. It should give you an atmosphere where you don’t feel embarrassed or like you are gonna catch something funky from the locker rooms.


Finally you want to look at cost. Some places are very expensive while others are fairly cheap. The price can and will dictate the clients and what will be available for you to use. Some gyms offer discounts to certain groups of people, students with IDs, certain corporates, disabilities, etc. Always check to see if you can get a discount. This can knock a good 100$ off your year in some cases.

When you go to join a gym keep all these things in mind and don’t be afraid to shop around. A lot of gyms will give you a free trial day to see if you like it or not. Good luck everyone!

(Image is from the Issho ni Training series of anime. I’m going to try and draw my own pictures for these articles in the future)



Fun Fitness Fact of the Day: Your body is built in the kitchen! Always remember that and make healthy choices. Here is a great article on the subject: http://natemiyaki.com/2011/03/24/the-8020-rule-of-fitness-nutrition/



Sierra Club’s Coal in Your Life quiz: in DC, approximately 639 asthma attacks and 47 deaths in 2010 can be attributed to power plant pollution. (h/t MoJo)



I read this amazing article about the impact of nutritional habits on our body… a great Read.

here goes:

The 80/20 Rule of Fitness Nutrition

Posted on  by natemiyaki

If you retain only one piece of information from my articles, I hope that it is this: your nutritional habits will have a far greater impact on your body composition and physique goals than any other fitness component.

Step back from the fitness industry, pop culture, or scientific debates and think about it logically for just a second. Lets say you perform 4 weight training sessions and 5 cardio sessions a week – a typical fitness protocol. That’s a total of 9 training sessions per week. That’s 9 chances to make a difference and change your body in a positive way.

Now, lets also say you eat 3 square meals a day. Better yet, as a fitness athlete you know about the advantages of meal spacing and eat 5 meals/snacks a day. That’s 21-35 opportunities a week to directly impact your muscle building and fat burning goals.

A common question in the fitness industry is, “what percentage of my physique enhancement goals will be a result of exercise, and what percentage will be a result of my diet?” Common answers are something like, “Well, they are both important. You can’t really assign percentages” or “training is 100%, diet is 100%”. But that doesn’t really give novice trainees an accurate depiction of the bigger picture. And in the big picture, diet will always have a bigger impact than training.

In our above example of 9 training sessions and 35 meals/snacks geared toward body composition improvement a week, that works out to about 20% accounted to physical activity and 80% accounted to diet. I’d say that’s a pretty accurate assessment of the physique enhancement process. If you want to look good, 80% of your results are determined by the food that you eat.

This is an article about fitness nutrition, not statistics, so lets leave the numbers behind and look at some real world examples. If you look around your gym, you’ve probably noticed some regulars that have been there day-in and day-out for months, or even years, but look exactly the same. All that time and effort with no results to show for it. What’s up with that? The answer is diet, or lack thereof.

Another good example is professional NFL offensive lineman. These guys are pro athletes that perform vigorous training protocols on a daily basis. They are big, strong, and could certainly throw me a severe beating. But most of them have a little jiggle with their wiggle, a large percentage of them are obese. How can this be? Again, the answer is poor, or no nutritional strategy.

Conversely, when you hear tales of dramatic weight loss or great body transformations, diet/nutrition is always at the forefront of the discussion. “How did you lose the weight?” friends will ask. “Oh, I went on such and such diet” or “I read this or that nutrition book.” People can make drastic changes in their physique with diet alone. Remember Jared from Subway (yeah I know he’s getting paid to say that, but you get my point).

The moral of the story is you can’t change your body just by exercising. As a matter of fact, I’d say you are wasting your time in the gym until you clean up your diet and implement a sound fitness nutrition protocol. It would be nice if we could work off last night’s junk meal with some extra cardio. Despite what some trainers would have you believe, it just doesn’t work that way.

When you are about to cheat and eat that slice of pizza or bowl of ice cream, remember the Fitness Nutrition 80:20 rule. What goes into your mouth accounts for 80% of how you look.

Copyright 2010 Nate Miyaki

The article can be found here —> http://natemiyaki.com/2011/03/24/the-8020-rule-of-fitness-nutrition/

Supercharged Brain Foods

Soy is not terribly bad for you

http://ow.ly/580y7 Fat Loss Nuggets Part I - Fat Loss Wisdom worth more than Gold. health fitness womenshealth menshealth

health

Want to buy a bra that protects your health as well as cleavage? Women will soon be able to buy a “smart bra” that is able to detect early-stage breast cancer. Recent innovations in the science of thermography and its use in detecting breast cancer may lead to apparel items such as bras being used as a early-warning signal.

This smart bra was invented by Dr. Elias Siores, Ph.D., who holds the position of Director at the Centre for Research and Innovation at the University of Bolton in the United Kingdom. So how does it work? The bra uses a microwave antennae system integrated into the fabric of the bra, which detects abnormalities such as temperature changes in breasts.

Temperature changes represent increased blood flow which may indicated the development of tumors related to breast cancer. As these tumors grow, there is a higher demand for blood flow, which would then alert the user via the bra. The bra would then warn the user to seek medical consultation.

Work still needs to be done to increase the accuracy of the device, as there are many reasons for an increase in blood flow. However, Dr. Siores believes this technology is viable and is currently working to increase the sensitivity of the new technology in order to better distinguish tumor development from more benign reasons. I have no doubt this technology would be extremely popular and beneficial to women.

How sore throat is treated http://bit.ly/bE6rav health



the guy in the blue is my goal healthy body (but a little beefier) + this just makes me lol every time. like what is even going on here? 

The 5 Strangest Ways Your Mind Can Get Your Body Sick: Another Great CRACKED article on how your...

Apparently the only thing wrong with me is an extreme lack of vitamin D.
Your Vitamin D is supposed to be from 39-100, mine’s 18…

I WONDER WHY MINE’S SO LOW~ /shot

fak u tumblr
making me sick

Differences between Type I & Type II Diabetes:

Via



The girl i used to be…

The girl i want to be…

The girl my body is asking me to be…

Me, 2009.

Supercharged Brain Foods

Breast cancer trial: New drug lowers risk for at-risk patients

  • 65%decreased risk after taking hormone-blocking pill source

» A huge step forward: The study, which involved 4,500 people, represents progress towards a safe-to-take drug that prevents breast cancer in at-risk patients. While anti-estrogen drugs already exist on the market, they’ve had pretty horrific side effects that discourage their use. So far, aromatase inhibitors don’t have any of these side effects — but it’s important to note that there haven’t been long-term studies with this, either. (This is the first time researchers tested an aromatase inhibitor tested clinically.) However, it’s still encouraging and worth keeping an eye on.

Read ShortFormBlog• Follow

Drug That Treats Breast Cancer Found To Prevent It, Study Shows

Drug That Treats Breast Cancer Found To Prevent It, Study Shows:

Women who are at high risk for breast cancer that is fueled by the hormone estrogen could reduce their risk of getting cancer by taking the hormone-blocking drug Aromasin, according to a study presented at a conference in Chicago on Saturday.

“We proved that exemestane (Aromasin) reduced the risk of invasive breast cancer by 65%,” said lead author Dr. Paul Goss, who is a breast cancer specialist at Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital. Goss presented his research at the annual conference of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. The study has also been published in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Pfizer, the maker of Aromasin, announced in May that the U.S. patent for this drug had expired, making it eligible for generic drug manufacturers to produce and sell it.

Goss expects the price of this drug to decline quickly because of this. However, he says Pfizer would not reveal to him if they plan to ask for an extension of their patent based on this research. A spokesperson for the company, which funded some of this research, would not comment on this topic either.

Keep away colon and other cancers by “Getting your beauty sleep”

Well-rested people are perceived to be younger, healthier and more attractive – and even if  you’ve been dog-tired for months, it takes only one night of great sleep for your beauty and health score to head back up, a recent Swedish study shows. At the same time, fitting in at least seven hours of sleep nightly single-handedly cuts your risk of colorectal adenomas (abnormal cells that can quickly turn cancerous) in half, according to just-published Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine research. “Less sleep can lower your production of melatonin, a natural hormone that helps repair damaged DNA,” explains lead scientist Li Li, M.D. “It can also trigger insulin resistance, which has been shown to increase the risk of colon cancer.”

  -Brenda Kearns

Our cell phones are trying to kill us!

Our cell phones are trying to kill us!

FDA: No Link Between Common High Blood-Pressure Pill and Cancer

The FDA ended a safety review of a class of drugs used to control high blood-pressure by concluding that the angiotensin receptor blockers don’t increase the risk of cancer.

Read More from the Wall Street Journal Here.

Yeesh!

You know what makes being outside in hot weather even more fun? Hot flashes! YEAH! Right on! Talk about a good time! If you want to have fun you should give hot flashes in the heat a try. I didn’t know that my sweat could sweat until today. Whew. If I were back home I’d be drinking a nice cool sweet tea right about now to help get rid of these nasty hot flashes. Hmm…

WARNING: Life itself is possibly carcinogenic

Yep, I’m making a ‘funny’.

Here are a couple links to this new ‘scare’ about cell phones being linked to actually ‘causing’ cancer, ergo being a carcinogen.

Yahoo News: us_cancer_cellphones

Consumer Reports: cell-phone-radiation-possibly-carcinogenic

CNN: cell.phones.radiation.levels

That last link is actually dissecting the different models of phones and the amount of radiation they are emitting.

Geesh.

Let’s make a couple things clear here. The WHO made the statement ‘possibly’ carcinogenic. Possibly can mean a whole lot of something, and a whole lot of nothing. Possibly is not conclusive. I mean your car, your clothing, your computer and everything electromagnetic can ‘possibly’ be carcinogenic. There has been no definitive cause-and-effect relationship between cell phones and cancer. And ultimately there will probably be a relationship in years to come, but I highly doubt anyone can prove them to be causal, there are simply way to may extraneous variables and factors.

I still haven’t seen the published and reproducible evidence via random controlled studies that prove these ‘warnings’. And I’m betting we probably will never see them, because it’s just simply not possible to control the ‘environment’.

I still can’t believe they made an official statement using the words ‘possibly carcinogenic’. Just about anything that exists in our world can be ‘possibly carcinogenic’. The very idea that something is or is not carcinogenic is going under the guided proof that something is directly responsible for causing cancer, any cancer.

Oh, and in case you were wondering, just about everything out there can potentially increase your risk of cancer. Sorry folks.

Aren’t we putting the cart before the horse here? Isn’t this just a lil bit of grand standing or even quite possibly inciting hysteria?

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&videoId=bestoftv/2011/05/31/exp.nr.cell.phone.carcinogen.cnn

WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk

By Danielle Dellorto, CNN

(CNN)— Radiation from cell phones can possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization. The agency now lists mobile phone use in the same “carcinogenic hazard” category as lead, engine exhaust and chloroform.

Before its announcement Tuesday, WHO had assured consumers that no adverse health effects had been established.

A team of 31 scientists from 14 countries, including the United States, made the decision after reviewing peer-reviewed studies on cell phone safety. The team found enough evidence to categorize personal exposure as “possibly carcinogenic to humans.”

What that means is they found some evidence of increase in glioma and acoustic neuroma brain cancer for mobile phone users, but have not been able to draw conclusions for other types of cancers

“The biggest problem we have is that we know most environmental factors take several decades of exposure before we really see the consequences,” said Dr. Keith Black, chairman of neurology at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing. It is not like an X-ray, but more like a very low-powered microwave oven.

“What microwave radiation does in most simplistic terms is similar to what happens to food in microwaves, essentially cooking the brain,” Black said. “So in addition to leading to a development of cancer and tumors, there could be a whole host of other effects like cognitive memory function, since the memory temporal lobes are where we hold our cell phones.”

Wireless industry responded to Tuesday’s announcement saying it “does not mean cell phones cause cancer.” CTIA-The Wireless Association added that WHO researchers “did not conduct any new research, but rather reviewed published studies.”

The European Environmental Agency has pushed for more studies, saying cell phones could be as big a public health risk as smoking, asbestos and leaded gasoline. The head of a prominent cancer-research institute at the University of Pittsburgh sent a memo to all employees urging them to limit cell phone use because of a possible risk of cancer.

When you look at cancer development — particularly brain cancer — it takes a long time to develop.I think it is a good idea to give the public some sort of warning that long-term exposure to radiation from your cell phone could possibly cause cancer,” said Dr. Henry Lai, research professor in bioengineering at University of Washington who has studied radiation for more than 30 years.

Results from the largest international study on cell phones and cancer was released in 2010. It showed participants in the study who used a cell phone for 10 years or more had doubled the rate of brain glioma, a type of tumor. To date, there have been no long-term studies on the effects of cell phone usage among children.

“Children’s skulls and scalps are thinner. So the radiation can penetrate deeper into the brain of children and young adults. Their cells are at a dividing faster rate, so the impact of radiation can be much larger.” said Black of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

In February, a study by researchers at the National Institutes of Health, revealed radiation emitted after just 50 minutes on a mobile phone increases the activity in brain cells. The effects of brain activity being artificially stimulated are still unknown.

Neurosurgeon and CNN chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta says Tuesday’s announcement, “dealt a blow to those who have long said, ‘There is no possible mechanism for cell phones to cause cancer.’ By classifying cell phones as a possible carcinogen, they also seem to be tacitly admitting a mechanism could exist.”

Manufacturers of many popular cell phones already warn consumers to keep their device away from their body and medical experts say there other ways to minimize cell phone radiation.

The Apple iPhone 4 safety manual says users’ radiation exposure should not exceed FCC guidelines: “When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 millimeters (5/8 inch) away from the body.”

BlackBerry Bold advises users to “keep the BlackBerry device at least 0.98 inch (25 millimeters) from your body when the BlackBerry device is transmitting.”

The logic behind such recommendations is that the further the phone is from the body, the less radiation is absorbed. Users can also use the speakerphone function or a wired earpiece to gain some distance.

Users can text instead of talk if they want to keep the phone away from their faces.

Finally, cell phones emit the most radiation when they are attempting to connect to cellular towers. A moving phone, or a phone in an area with a weak signal, has to work harder, giving of more radiation. So users can avoid using their cell phones in elevators, buildings and rural areas if they want to reduce their exposure, experts say.

WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk – CNN.com

Elisabeth Sladen The Famous 'Doctor Who' Actress Is Dead

Elisabeth Sladen


Elisabeth Sladen with Tom Baker

Sixty three year old, Elisabeth Sladen, who is best known for her role in Doctor Who died after fighting a long batter with cancer.

BBC announced her death and about the cancer she was suffering from. Very few people knew about her ill health.

She played the role of Time Lord's assistant, Sarah Jane Smith opposite actors Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker in the BBC television series since 1973.

She left the show in 1976 but took the role of an investigative journalist in The Sarah Jane Adventures.

She leaves behind a husband, actor Brian Miller and a daughter Sadie.

May God bless Elisabeth's soul!

Farrah Fawcett
















Last night I wanted to write something about Farrah Fawcett. This beautiful lady died at the age of 62 due to anal cancer. She was being under treatment for the past 3 years. She was indeed one of the coolest Charlie’s Angels. In fact, I’ve always liked the original Charlie’s Angels. They had class & they were all beautiful. No one else could have done justice to the character of a private investigator Jill Munroe as Farrah Fawcett did. She also came with Lee Majors in The Six Million Dollar Man.

In a 1977 interview she said: "When the show (Charlie’s Angels) was number three, I thought it was our acting. When we got to be number one, I decided it could only be because none of us wears a bra."

Ryan O'Neal, the longtime companion who returned to her side when she became ill, was with her. ‘After a long and brave battle with cancer, our beloved Farrah has passed away," O'Neal said. "Although this is an extremely difficult time for her family and friends, we take comfort in the beautiful times that we shared with Farrah over the years and the knowledge that her life brought joy to so many people around the world."

"Her big message to people is don't give up. No matter what they say to you, keep fighting," Alana Stewart, who filmed Fawcett as she underwent treatment.